Customer Reviews

Rating: 3.6 of 5 stars 80 Reviews 80 Reviews 3.7 out of 5 Stars

75% Recommend

75% of reviewersrecommend this product

Rating: 3.6 of 5 stars 3.7 / 5

You've Already Reviewed This Item

Dakpets FURblaster Dog & Cat Grooming Glove

Dakpets FURblaster Dog & Cat Grooming Glove

  • Most Helpful Positive Review

    Read All 49 Positive Reviews

    Pretty good

    By Hazelnut on Jun 17, 2021

    I really enjoy this glove for getting hair in between her deshedding tool. It is not as rough and it seems I could brush her for hours and continue to get hair! I also love being able to get her legs as with the deshedding tool and how boney her legs are, it doesnt work well. My hands are small and the I really enjoy this glove for getting hair in between her deshedding tool. It is not as rough and it seems I could brush her for hours and continue to get hair! I also love being able to get her legs as with the deshedding tool and how boney her legs are, it doesnt work well. My hands are small and the glove doesnt fit well but well enough to make it work. Just by flapping the glove in the air, most of the hair comes right off. … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report
  • Most Helpful Critical Review

    Read All 31 Critical Reviews

    dakpetdisappointment

    By ManxMenu on Jul 16, 2021

    Yeah, a real disappointment. The knobs on this shedding glove are shallow, and though it says it can be used on longhair cats--i seriously doubt that. This glove was close to useless on my Manx. Manx cats have a double thick coat and this glove could barely pull fur off the topcoat. Hard motions are Yeah, a real disappointment. The knobs on this shedding glove are shallow, and though it says it can be used on longhair cats--i seriously doubt that. This glove was close to useless on my Manx. Manx cats have a double thick coat and this glove could barely pull fur off the topcoat. Hard motions are required. This is NOT a cat shedding tool. … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report