Customer Reviews

Rating: 3.8 of 5 stars 2598 Reviews 2598 Reviews 3.9 out of 5 Stars

78% Recommend

78% of reviewersrecommend this product

Rating: 3.8 of 5 stars 3.9 / 5

You've Already Reviewed This Item

Ethical Pet Can Covers

Ethical Pet Can Covers

  • Most Helpful Positive Review

    Read All 1770 Positive Reviews

    You get what you pay for, but they do work-ish

    By JustAPerson on Apr 17, 2021

    You definitely get what you pay for with these. They were literally just a hair small for a 5.5oz can of cat food, but you can get it on if you really try. 2 out of the 6 I bought cracked around the edge, but they still worked. They will not fit 12.5oz cans however. Overall, they fit the budget. All You definitely get what you pay for with these. They were literally just a hair small for a 5.5oz can of cat food, but you can get it on if you really try. 2 out of the 6 I bought cracked around the edge, but they still worked. They will not fit 12.5oz cans however. Overall, they fit the budget. All the other options I found were WAY overpriced! The profit margin on those things must be out of this world! … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report
  • Most Helpful Critical Review

    Read All 828 Critical Reviews

    Doesn't fit every can

    By Chicago on Apr 29, 2021

    As some other reviewers mentioned, these lids don't fit or stay secure on standard 5.5 oz cans. I also learned after receiving them that they're not dishwasher safe. Who needs another thing to hand wash? These were relatively useless. Really wish Chewy still offered the Van Ness can covers that I usually As some other reviewers mentioned, these lids don't fit or stay secure on standard 5.5 oz cans. I also learned after receiving them that they're not dishwasher safe. Who needs another thing to hand wash? These were relatively useless. Really wish Chewy still offered the Van Ness can covers that I usually get. Disappointing that these aren't available anymore. … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report