Customer Reviews

488 Reviews 488 Reviews 4 out of 5 Stars

82% Recommend

82% of reviewersrecommend this product

4 / 5

You've Already Reviewed This Item

KONG Tug Dog Toy

KONG Tug Dog Toy

  • Most Helpful Positive Review

    Read All 346 Positive Reviews

    Love this Tug Toy!

    By Claire on Sep 4, 2019

    Another great Kong toy! Our 45 lb lab mix loves to tug and chew, and let me tell you, this toy is AMAZING! Whenever we would play tug with ropes or old t-shirts, she would want to shred them and eat the fibers, but since this toy is sturdy Kong rubber, she can chomp all she wants and the toy stays intact Another great Kong toy! Our 45 lb lab mix loves to tug and chew, and let me tell you, this toy is AMAZING! Whenever we would play tug with ropes or old t-shirts, she would want to shred them and eat the fibers, but since this toy is sturdy Kong rubber, she can chomp all she wants and the toy stays intact! I'm impressed that her tug strength hasn't split the toy either! Great job as always, Kong! … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report
  • Most Helpful Critical Review

    Read All 142 Critical Reviews

    Dogs love it, but not as tough as we thought :(

    By Raelynn on Aug 26, 2019

    Our dogs loved playing Tug-o-War with this toy, but even between my 1-year-old and 11-week-old labs playing, it did not hold up very well. There are tears along the sides of the toy stemming from the inside of the ring where the dogs don't grab it. This toy came recommended by Chewy, as I reached out Our dogs loved playing Tug-o-War with this toy, but even between my 1-year-old and 11-week-old labs playing, it did not hold up very well. There are tears along the sides of the toy stemming from the inside of the ring where the dogs don't grab it. This toy came recommended by Chewy, as I reached out and asked a Chewy member what Tug-o-War toy would be tough enough and hold up well. It may last with other dogs, but it didn't last for ours. … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report