Out of Stock Snugarooz Ryder the Robot Dog Toy, 13-in, slide 1 of 1

Snugarooz Ryder the Robot Dog Toy, 13-in

  • Price:

    $15.39 FREE 1-3 dayShipping over $49

Temporarily Out of Stock
cw-icon-heart Created with Sketch. Add to Favorites

Introduce your paw-some pal Rover to the Snugarooz Ryder the Robot Dog Toy. He’ll have hours of fun ruff-housing with his new chewy sci-fi companion. This brightly colored toy is crafted using a soft, plush cotton that your pupper will love to cuddle. The exterior is paw-fectly complemented by the inner crinkly material that crunches when your doggo chews. The bungee arms and legs will keep him entertained as he tugs, pulls and bites his new robot buddy. With a noisemaking squeaker inside, he’ll stay actively engaged with the toy over time, chomping down to hear that fun little cyber squeak.

Key Benefits
  • Doggos love this the clever design of this robot chew toy.
  • Complete with stretchy bungee arms and legs.
  • Features a crinkling sensation when your canine chews.
  • Crafted using a plush cotton material that’s soft to the touch.
  • Noisemaker helps keep your doggo actively engaged and exercising.

See all items by Snugarooz

  • Item Number
  • Lifestage
  • Toy Feature
  • Material
Rating: 1.0 of 5 stars 1 Review 1 Review 1 out of 5 Stars

Filter reviews by star rating

100% Recommend

100% of reviewersrecommend this product

Rating: 1.0 of 5 stars 1 / 5

You've Already Reviewed This Item

1 Review

Showing 1 Review

  • 1 out of 5 stars

    poor material

    By Dukesmom on Jun 22, 2020

    I bought Rosie the Robot from a feed store in my area. She is the pink checkered one and she lasted a long time with my German Shepard pup. However it was time to get a new one and I found them on chewy and decided to get both Rosie and Ryder. Ryder lasted a whole 5 minutes. He is made from a softer weaker material whereas Rosie is made from a stronger thicker stiff material and it’s double layered. I definitely recommend Rosie over Ryder.

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report