Customer Reviews

Rating: 4.5 of 5 stars 603 Reviews 603 Reviews 4.6 out of 5 Stars

94% Recommend

94% of reviewersrecommend this product

Rating: 4.5 of 5 stars 4.6 / 5

You've Already Reviewed This Item

VICTOR Classic Professional Formula Dry Dog Food

VICTOR Classic Professional Formula Dry Dog Food

  • Most Helpful Positive Review

    Read All 530 Positive Reviews

    Love this brand

    By Charlie on Jan 13, 2022

    I arrived at this brand after trying a few others, and am very satisfied. My dog loves the taste, it helped her gain lean muscle mass (she’s high energy), and her poops have never looked healthier:) Highly recommend. This particular recipe is gluten free but not grain free, and has pre and probiotics I arrived at this brand after trying a few others, and am very satisfied. My dog loves the taste, it helped her gain lean muscle mass (she’s high energy), and her poops have never looked healthier:) Highly recommend. This particular recipe is gluten free but not grain free, and has pre and probiotics. … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report
  • Most Helpful Critical Review

    Read All 73 Critical Reviews

    Smells not so good

    By Edub on Jan 12, 2022

    When I first used this food awhile ago my puppy smelled. Not knowing it was the food I switched brands because I wanted to try something else. The smell went away but I didn't connect it to the food. I got some more of this recently and as I was making my pups bowl of food my girl smelled it and said When I first used this food awhile ago my puppy smelled. Not knowing it was the food I switched brands because I wanted to try something else. The smell went away but I didn't connect it to the food. I got some more of this recently and as I was making my pups bowl of food my girl smelled it and said "that food stinks" I smelled it a lil closer and realized it was the same smell that my pup use to have. It seems to be a good food but made my pup smell bad!!! … more

    You liked it! Something went wrong. Please try again later. Report